Column: Pending legislation attacks private health insurance, increasing costs – Tulsa World
Oklahoma Families for Affordable Health Care
It is a common refrain at the Oklahoma Capitol that lawmakers should pursue free-market solutions, avoid costly government mandates, and not support special interests over the best interests of all Oklahomans.
Where health care policy is concerned, many lawmakers were elected on explicit promises to oppose and repeal Obamacare and other Big Government health care policies. In this context, it is puzzling to see so many lawmakers working to actively dismantle the alternative to Obamacare, which is employer-sponsored health insurance, on which many Oklahomans rely to manage their health care costs.
Employer-sponsored health insurance relies on the ability to contract with third-party vendors to offer health benefit coverage and other benefits. Those vendors â health plans â then negotiate with health care providers to offer services at agreed upon price points, thereby lowering and allowing for the management of such costs.
People are also reading…
Guerin Emig: The door closed and Lincoln Riley went ‘boom,’ but Cale Gundy has recovered just fine
TV series starring Sylvester Stallone to film in Tulsa, with dates announced in casting call
UPDATED: OSSAA state basketball tournament pairings and results
Watch Now: State Board of Education intervenes in new academic standards-setting for health, physical education
Guerin Emig: Brent Venables going 0 to 100 as OU head coach, without missing many details along the way
Legislation advancing in Legislature would strip school lunch programs from State Ed Department and move to Ag
Bob Doucette: What a nuclear attack would look like for us
Nursing shortage spurs OU to make ‘historic’ change to accept all qualified applicants
German-based tech firm to invest $270 million, employ 150 at Pryor’s MidAmerica Industrial Park
OSSAA announces 6A, 5A, 4A, 3A, 2A state basketball tournament pairings
Check out the new menu at The Vista restaurant at Gathering Place
Tulsa experts: Ukraine war is heading toward an ‘unpleasant compromise’
Bill Haisten: Frank Haithâs departure pressures Rick Dickson to find the right fit for TU
Bill Haisten: With a 6A title for the Hornets, Eli Brown III would become a Booker T. legend
After a 20-loss season and attendance issues, TUâs Frank Haith resigns after 8 seasons
When you go to a provider that is âin network,â they have agreed to honor the pricing expectations of oneâs health plan. Similarly, employers also encourage their employees to use pharmacies that sell prescription drugs at lower prices or may incentivize the use of lower cost options like mail order.
Health plan networks are the primary tools used in the private sector to make health care more affordable. This longstanding health care model is being systematically dismantled by legislators responding to calls from special interest groups, in direct opposition to the health care cost concerns expressed by Oklahoma families, businesses and consumers.
For instance, House Bill 3023 would dismantle privately agreed upon contracts that establish cost savings networks of dentists. These dentists join a network of preferred providers in exchange for agreeing to serve various businessesâ employees and their families at an agreed upon price.
The establishment of these networks provides accountability and transparency for all parties involved, but most importantly it protects the budgets of both families and businesses. At the behest of dentists who are either not currently in a network or perhaps in-network and want to charge their patients more, lawmakers are considering dismantling these contractual consumer safeguards.
Should HB 3023 become law, it will ultimately result in Oklahoma patients paying tens of millions of dollars more in dental bills every year.
Senate Bill 1860, along with a suite of similar bills, would function in much the same way for pharmacies. It would dismantle cost protections for consumers and force employers to treat a pharmacy that sells a pill for $4 the same way as a pharmacy selling the same pill for $2.
SB 1860 would end incentives for employers to encourage convenient and less costly mail order drug delivery, even though studies show it is medically beneficial to patients, who are more likely to take drugs that are delivered directly to them on a regular schedule.
SB 1860 and other similar measures would benefit some pharmacists at the ultimate expense of patients, families and employers.
Oklahomans should be disturbed by this trend in health care policy for many reasons. These bills will drive up the cost of health care for families, patients and employers.
Individualsâ health will decline as they forgo care due to increasing costs.
Families will suffer economically at a time when inflation and other world events are already hurting their bottom line.
Businesses will have to choose between fewer health care benefits or layoffs.
This current trend in health care policy by lawmakers is unhealthy and costly for Oklahomans.
It used to be taken for granted that lawmakers were trying to reduce health care costs for the population at large; to do otherwise would be unfathomable. Now, however, lawmakers are openly pushing legislation that enriches a few special interests at the expense of all Oklahomans.
If something does not change quickly, Oklahomans will be less healthy and less prosperous.
Ericka McPherson is the executive director of Oklahoma Families for Affordable Health Care.
Get opinion pieces, letters and editorials sent directly to your inbox weekly!
