Strata clean-up: “It’s just not right,” says ACIL chair

Strata clean-up: “It’s just not right,” says ACIL chair

Strata clean-up: “It’s just not right,” says ACIL chair | Insurance Business Australia

Insurance News

Strata clean-up: “It’s just not right,” says ACIL chair

Has a national survey unearthed more questionable practices?

Insurance News

By
Daniel Wood

“It’s just not right and too many people have kept quiet,” said Tyrone Shandiman (pictured above).

The submissions deadline for a nationwide survey seeking stakeholder input on strata industry misconduct has closed. Shandiman, who is chair of the Australian Consumers Insurance Lobby (ACIL), told Insurance Business that 80 submissions were received. He said the number, more than he expected, is evenly spread between consumers and businesses involved in the strata sector.

The survey was part of ACIL’s response to growing concerns around an alleged “systemic pattern” of misconduct by some strata managers and brokers. According to some reports, there are brokers charging fees three times the typical rate.

Widening the investigation

Shandiman, who is managing director of the brokerage Strata Insurance Solutions, said the survey was also about widening the scope of ACIL’s investigation.

In February, ACIL called on the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to investigate 146 cases of alleged strata industry misconduct. Shandiman said the regulators are considering whether to officially investigate.

He said most of these alleged cases came directly from his experience in the strata industry or from the experience of ACIL committee members.

“It needs to be a wider survey and this national survey has been done to back that [the 146 cases] up,” he said. “If anyone questions why I’m doing this I can tell them I certainly have nothing to gain personally from this.”

See also  QBE strikes gold at the Insurance Times Tech & Innovation Awards

In a recent LinkedIn post, Shandiman sought to address the issue of his “potential conflicts of interest.”

****PLEASE EMBED THIS POST HERE******

<iframe src=”https://www.linkedin.com/embed/feed/update/urn:li:share:7177578969406271489″ height=”910″ width=”504″ frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=”” title=”Embedded post”></iframe>

He said whatever the origin of any alleged cases of misconduct, “It’s a civic duty of anyone to report wrongdoing.”

The statement also said Brell is “undertaking an immediate audit on his business and has invited NSW Fair Trading and SCA NSW to conduct a review of Netstrata’s practices.”

SCA NSW has also said it is commissioning a “a full investigation by an independent firm” of “any allegations of behaviour that may or may not meet professional standards”

Trowbridge concluded that the “opaque” brokers fee system should be phased out in the interests of transparency.

“In many such cases, the strata committee and the owners are not aware of the details of these arrangements,” he said. “That is part of the reason why transparent disclosure needs to be pursued across the industry.”

He referred to the Strata Insurance Disclosure Handbook, his reference guide based on his review. On page 17 of the handbook Trowbridge set out a series of steps designed to improve the way insurance brokers are appointed for strata insurance policies.

SCA Australasia responds

Following the cases or alleged misconduct identified by ACIL and ABC News, SCA Australasia released a statement.

The statement said the peak body was taking a number of actions including fast tracking best practice measures and appointing an independent chair for its complaints and conduct panel.

Are you a stakeholder in the strata insurance industry? What should be done now to improve the industry’s transparency and correct any misconduct? Please tell us below

See also  Can I pay with credit card at IAAI?

Related Stories

Keep up with the latest news and events

Join our mailing list, it’s free!